Wikipedia talk:Speedy deletions

three of the 20 pages that were marked for speedy deletion and had their content removed should be reverted and the notice removed, as the notice itself says:

This page is a candidate for speedy deletion.

If you disagree with its speedy deletion, please explain why on its talk page or at Wikipedia:Speedy deletions. If this page obviously does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from articles that you have created yourself.

Administrators - Remember to check if anything links here and the page history (last edit) before deleting.

The three pages that should be exceptions to the rule are ᎤᎵᎮᎵᏍᏗ, ᎡᎶᏆ and United States Supreme Court. ᎠᎺᎢ should also be left alone to be worked on. Take Sid Vicious and Christianity, but leave these pages that are in process of improvement.

I do intend to improve these pages, am in fact working on doing so, but am unable to "remove this notice". Whether this is because the anonymous tagger is an admin (albeit an anonymous one) or for whatever other reason, when I try to remove the tag in "Edit this page" there is nothing to remove, and when I try to edit the "Candidates for speedy deletion" category, I am unable to get an editable text.

Quite annoying. It's hard enough working for the smaller languages without people at Wikipedia of all places throwing curve balls at one.--Dzidzelalic 22:39, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Don't create pages in English. Either write them correctly or not at all. It is not acceptable to create pages in English and say that one day you'll get round to translating them. There should be no English content WHATSOEVER on this site. We have the English Wikipedia for that. 86.134.209.115 00:29, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Where did you get these notions? There is non-English content on the English Wikipedia, why should there not be non-Tsalagi content on the Cherokee Wikipedia? In any event, if you feel so strongly about this principle, why are you posting here in English, and (if you are the one who wrote "Wrong Language" on several of the pages, why did you write that in English???? Certainly it is right that the English should diminish and the Tsalagi increase, but the approach used by the recent purger and advocated by you does damage to the Tsalagi content as well, and to its accessibility for Tsalagi readers and potential editors. Please replace English content with comparable Tsalagi content instead of just burning down the forest in an anglophonic anglophobic rage. ᎯᏣᎳᎩᏍ? ᏣᎳᎩᏍ Ꭿ ᏬᏂ?--Dzidzelalic 07:14, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

let's keep the page

I am able to contribute to the cherokee pages. finding the time was difficult, but I have it. I think it is highly important to get more information available in cherokee..

TysonT Cherokee